How does honest effect work

User Info: hope Wouldn't divine wrath work against Honest if not mistaken. Divine Wrath also costs card advantage. Doesnt matter cause I was just answering the question TC was asking. More topics from this board How do I get Exodia deck cards? Side Quest 2 Answers How do i unlock the battle packs in general? General 1 Answer Unlock rare cards through duel challenges?

Tech Support 4 Answers Dark World related cards? Build 1 Answer. Ask A Question. Browse More Questions. Keep me logged in on this device. In fact, although most businesspeople are not so principled as to boycott powerful trust breakers, they do try to keep their own word most of the time. Even allowing for convenient forgetfulness, we cannot help being swayed by comments like this:. I think that when I was young and naive about many things, I may have been underpaid for what my work was, but that was a learning experience.

But if I charge my customers the list price, they will do the right thing by me when there is a glut. Just as those who trust find reasons for the risks they want to run, those who are called on to keep a difficult promise cast around for justification even when the hard numbers point the other way.

But why has it taken root? Why do business men and women want to believe that trustworthiness pays, disregarding considerable evidence to the contrary? The answer lies firmly in the realm of social and moral behavior, not in finance. The businesspeople we interviewed set great store on the regard of their family, friends, and the community at large. They valued their reputations, not for some nebulous financial gain but because they took pride in their good names.

Even more important, since outsiders cannot easily judge trustworthiness, businesspeople seem guided by their inner voices, by their consciences. When we cited examples to our interviewees in which treachery had apparently paid, we heard responses like:. They may be rich in dollars and very poor in their own sense of values and what life is about.

I cannot judge anybody by the dollars; I judge them by their deeds and how they react. All the other success we have had is secondary. The importance of moral and social motives in business cannot be overemphasized.

A selective memory, a careful screening of the facts may help sustain the fiction of profitable virtue, but the fundamental basis of trust is moral. We keep promises because we believe it is right to do so, not because it is good business. Cynics may dismiss the sentiments we heard as posturing, and it is true that performance often falls short of aspiration.

But we can find no other way than conscience to explain why trust is the basis for so many relationships. At first, these findings distressed us. On further reflection, however, we concluded that this system was fine, both from a moral and a material point of view.

The moral advantages are simple. Concepts of trust and, more broadly, of virtue would be empty if bad faith and wickedness were not financially rewarding. If wealth naturally followed straight dealing, we would only need to speak about conflicts between the long term and the short, stupidity and wisdom, high discount rates and low.

It is the very absence of predictable financial reward that makes honesty a moral quality we hold dear. Trust based on morality rather than self-interest also provides a great economic benefit. Consider the alternative, where trust is maintained by fear. A world in which the untrustworthy face certain retribution is a small world where every one knows and keeps a close eye on!

A village, really, deeply suspicious not only of commodities brokers but also of all strangers, immigrants, and innovators. No shades or ambiguities exist here. They do not take chances on schemes that might fail through the tangled strands of bad faith, incompetence, overoptimism, or plain bad luck.

A dark pessimism pervades this world. Opportunities look scarce and setbacks final. In this world, there are no second chances either. A convicted felon like Thomas Watson, Sr. A Federal Express would never again be extended credit after an early default on its loan agreements. The rules are clear: an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth. Kill or be killed.

Little, closed, tit-for-tat worlds do exist. Trust is self-reinforcing because punishment for broken promises is swift—in price-fixing rings, loan-sharking operations, legislative log rolling, and the mutually assured destruction of nuclear deterrence. Exceed your quota and suffer a price war. At best such a world is stable and predictable. In outcome, if not intent, moral standards are high, since no one enters into relationships of convenience with the untrustworthy. On the other hand, such a world resists all change, new ideas, and innovations.

It is utterly inimical to entrepreneurship. Fortunately, the larger world in which we live is less rigid. It is populated with trusting optimists who readily do business with strangers and innovators. People are allowed to move from Maine to Montana or from plastics to baked goods without a lot of whys and wherefores.

Projects that require the integrity and ability of a large team and are subject to many market and technological risks can nonetheless attract enthusiastic support. Optimists focus more on the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow than on their ability to find and punish the guilty in case a failure occurs. Our tolerance for broken promises encourages risk taking.

Tolerance also allows resources to move out of enterprises that have outlived their functions. When the buggy whip manufacturer is forced out of business, we understand that some promises will have to be broken—promises that perhaps ought not to have been made.

Even unreconstructed scoundrels are tolerated in our world as long as they have something else to offer. The genius inventors, the visionary organizers, and the intrepid pioneers are not cast away merely because they cannot be trusted on all dimensions. And this, perhaps unprincipled, tolerance facilitates a dynamic entrepreneurial economy. Forgot your username or password? User Info: Driftking88 Driftking88 8 years ago 1 Hello!

Tried searching for it but nothing came up so here it goes. Does Honest's effect only gain the attack of the monster so that they are equal? Then they're both destroyed then, right? User Info: JumpstyIe JumpstyIe 8 years ago 2 it gains the attack added onto the current attack, so your monster will win. User Info: odanzrexorc odanzrexorc 8 years ago 7 Driftking88 posted User Info: Dmanomusic Dmanomusic 8 years ago 9 What if both duelists have a light monster out, and they both have Honest in their hands, and try to use Honest?

New cards revealed part 4. If you get back into Yu-Gi-Oh! Can someone point me to another place where I can read the rulings on the 4 stages of the damage step since I have repeated arguements over cards I try to counter honest with. Since it seems at least to my view that if a player holds control of honest that there are no counter traps that could work agaisnt it.

Since if the attacking player just waits till the last stage of the damage step which i don't see why they wouldn't it won't matter what you chain to it it will always lose. Now I know this doesnt apply during my turn since I hold turn priority for playing the first card but I cant find any way around it for when I'm being attacked. I attack, wait till the last phase of the damage step and play limiter removal. Oppenent can chain honest to it but it wont matter since limiter removal will resolve last and they cant wait for the next stage since there monster will already be dead.

Oppenent attacks, waits till the last of damage step and plays Honest. I don't play limiter removal since mine will resolve before honest and the light monster will simply get the upgraded attack value anyway.