What is the difference between burris ewell and walter cunningham

It also shows how the community just lets them go on their way to avoid a conflict. Walter Cunningham, on the other hand, is a respectful boy who wouldn't backtalk a teacher for anything in the world. He has been taught respect and honor, even if he is hungry. He doesn't say it for himself, but Scout explains as follows:. They never took anything off of anybody, they get along on what they have.

They don't have much, but they get along on it" Therefore, the Cunninghams have a sense of honor even though they have a difficult time feeding themselves; but the Ewells aren't taught to be respectful or honorable.

It all comes down to how a child is taught to behave at home. Both boys are poor and hungry, but one is taught respect while the other is allowed to run wild. Post a Comment. Please provide quotes as evidence. He is a shy and timid little boy. A muscle twitched in my jaw. My jaw twitched again. Miss Caroline went to her desk and opened her purse.

You can pay me back tomorrow. One of these characters include Burris Ewell. Burris Ewell displays a great multitude of his personality in the brief moments in which one meets him. Burris Ewell can be characterized as controlling and condescending due to his poor family life. Burris clearly displays his condescension and controlling behavior in several. I am not respected in the eyes of Maycomb.

Poor people like me are usually not respected by others. Finch respects me and my entire family because we understand the difference between right and wrong. It first started when I was going with the mob to lynch Tom Robinson. This is most likely the case with the stories that are based on the truth, but are not the whole truth. Stories that are based on the truth are not completely the truth in that the author adds small details to make the story more interesting.

Similarities and differences are found. Compare and Contrast the Cunningham and Ewell Families In To Kill A Mockingbird, as an additional message to the main theme of the novel, Lee seeks to show two polar reactions to poverty, that of the Cunninghams and the Ewells.

Her experience of the Great Depression was a major influence in the writing of the book, as she uses the contrast of these two families to show that there is hope for those in poverty, if people learn from the Ewells and emulate the Cunninghams.

She introduces the values she considers to highlight the difference between the Cunninghams and Ewells, and uses this example to show that "Fine Folk" are not born into the position, but rather are considered as such on account of their qualities. The position of "Fine …show more content… Burris Ewell, however, "was the filthiest human being [Scout] had ever seen". He "laughed rudely" and "slouched leisurely" away from the classroom.

This apathetic, lackadaisical and disrespectful attitude is typical of the Ewell family, and contrasts with Walter's strong sense of dignity, showing the vast difference between them.

A characteristic that is strongly emphasised in the novel is pride, which Lee uses to show that poverty does not necessarily humble a family. The Cunninghams' pride is so strong they will not accept outside help, as shown when Scout tells her teacher, "the Cunninghams never took anything they can't pay back".

In stark contrast to this, the Ewells "had been the disgrace of Maycomb for three generations", living off "regular weekly appearances at the welfare office for his [relief] check".